TL;DR
Core Problem and Solution: SEO on-page checker tools address inefficient manual SEO analysis by automating the process, improving page performance, and increasing visibility in search engine results.
Market Overview: The SEO on-page checker market serves a growing number of SMBs, with a TAM of approximately $20 billion/year with an average ARPA of $500. Despite intense competition, there are opportunities for niche solutions and simplified tools.
Opportunities: Potential exists for tools focusing on niche platforms like Substack, and combining on-page SEO with traffic estimation for simplified user experiences.
*👀 = Extra interesting (pay attention)
Target Audience
Small Business Owners: Want to enhance their website's search engine visibility without extensive SEO knowledge.
Content Creators: Seek to optimize content for better reach and engagement.
Digital Marketers: Need efficient tools to analyze and improve web page SEO performance.
Core Problem
Complex SEO Analysis
Businesses face challenges manually analyzing on-page SEO factors, which is time-consuming and requires expertise.
Limited Visibility
Without proper SEO optimization, websites struggle to achieve high visibility in search engine rankings.
Key Providers
Several key players dominate the SEO on-page checker market, with some extending their focus to include off-page SEO analysis as well. Notably, SEMrush is a major player used as reference, offering comprehensive SEO tools. Branded keyword searches are an indicator of brand strength, while non-branded searches reveal customer demand for specific features.
SEMrush
Annual Revenue: $85.8M
Employees: 1400
Free Plan: No
Users: 112,000 (100% paying)
Indexed Pages on Google: 500K
Branded Keyword Searches: 500K
Top Non-Branded Keywords: Website traffic checker (19K searches), Title generator (18.7K searches 👀)
ARPA: $765 (Calculated as $85.8M/112,000 users)
Revenue per Employee: $61.29K
Seobility
Annual Revenue: $3.6M
Employees: 14
Free Plan: Yes
Users: 500,000 (~2% paying)
Indexed Pages on Google: 2K
Monthly Visitors: 743K
Branded Keyword Searches: 20K
Top Non-Branded Keywords: SEO checker (40K searches), Website SEO checker (4K searches)
ARPA: $360 (Calculated as $3.6M/10,000 paying users)
Revenue per Employee: $257.14K
SEO Site Checkup 👀
Annual Revenue: ~$9M* 👀
Employees: 2 👀
Free Plan: No
Users: 15,000 (100% paying) 👀
Indexed Pages on Google: 20K
Monthly Visitors: 441K
Branded Keywords: 20K
Top Non-Branded Keywords: SEO checker (7.7K), Sitemap checker (4K 👀)
ARPA: $600 (Calculated as $9M/15,000 users)
Revenue per Employee: $4.5M
SEOptimer 👀
Annual Revenue: ~$1M* 👀
Employees: 3
Free Plan: No
Users: 2,500 (100% paying)
Indexed Pages on Google: 27K
Monthly Visitors: 731K
Branded Keyword Searches: 14.4K
Top Non-Branded Keywords: Sitemap checker (10.1K 👀), SEO audit (8.5K)
ARPA: $400 (Calculated as $1M/2,500 users)
Revenue per Employee: $333.33K
SEO Tester Online
Annual Revenue: $100K - 500K
Free Plan: No
Users: 500,000**
Indexed Pages on Google: 749
Monthly Visitors: 120K
Branded Keyword Searches: 1.6K
Top Non-Branded Keywords: SEO checker (2.4K)
ARPA: Varies due to broad revenue range and user base
**Note: Some figures are estimates or claims and may vary.
Provider Summary
The SEO on-page checker market is competitive, with providers differing in features, pricing models, and target audiences. Some services focus broadly on the entire SEO space, including links and on-page analysis, while others are more niche, concentrating specifically on on-page SEO. This segmentation allows for varied offerings, ranging from comprehensive, high-priced solutions to affordable, specialized tools.
Market Overview
Total Addressable Market (TAM) 👀
SMBs with websites: ~71% of 30 million in the US and similar in Europe (~42.6 million)
Interested in SEO: ~82% (of those with websites) 👀
TAM = 42.6 million × 82% × $500 (average spend per SMB) = $20 billion/year
Serviceable Available Market (SAM)
SMBs in target regions (US, Europe): ~30 million
Targeted with existing SEO solutions: 75% (~22.5 million)
SAM = 22.5 million × $500 = $11.25 billion/year
Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM)
Target market share: 2% (~450,000 SMBs)
SOM = 450,000 × $500 = $225 million/year
Opportunities (ERRC Framework)
Niche Solutions for Writers 👀
Eliminate: Unnecessary features for non-writers.
Reduce: Complexity of the tool, price 👀
Raise: Platform-specific SEO recommendations.
Create: Tools tailored for platforms like Substack or Medium. 👀
People in content writing are perfect customers for on-page SEO tools, as they can easily integrate them into their everyday toolbox. The technical aspect of developing a crawler specifically for platforms like Substack or Medium is relatively straightforward. There is potential for SEO tools that brand themselves as writer-friendly, given the existing demand and search volume in the SEO space.
On-page SEO + Traffic Estimation 👀
Eliminate: Overly complex interfaces.
Reduce: Additional, non-essential tools, price 👀
Raise: Simplicity and user-friendliness.
Create: One-page tools that suggest SEO improvements and predict traffic changes based on keyword volume. 👀
These opportunities highlight the potential for developing straightforward, niche-oriented solutions with strong value propositions for indie hackers and solo entrepreneurs.
Room for Improvement
These issues are extracted from customer complains from various platforms.
Terminology Confusion
Problem: Users find the jargon and terminology used in dashboards and settings confusing, leading to misinterpretations and incorrect actions.
Opportunity: Simplify language and provide clearer explanations or tooltips to make the tool more user-friendly.
Graphical User Interface (GUI)
Problem: Interfaces can be cluttered and unintuitive, making it difficult for users to navigate and utilize all features effectively.
Opportunity: Design a more intuitive, clean interface that improves user experience.
Bugs and Stability
Problem: Users report frequent bugs and crashes, leading to frustration and reduced trust in the tool.
Opportunity: Focus on stability and robust testing to ensure a smoother user experience.
Feature Overload 👀
Problem: Many tools offer too many features, overwhelming users who only need basic functions. 👀
Opportunity: Offer customizable feature sets or simpler versions of the tool for users who do not need advanced functionalities.
Pricing Structures 👀
Problem: Users find pricing plans complicated or not suited to their needs, especially small businesses or solo entrepreneurs.
Opportunity: Develop flexible pricing models, such as pay-as-you-go or modular pricing, to better cater to diverse user needs. 👀
Identifying and addressing these common patterns could provide readers with opportunities to develop tools that address these specific customer complaints, thereby improving user satisfaction and capturing market share.
Before you go 👀
I love diving deep into micro markets, but what really keeps me motivated is seeing new subscribers. If you’d like to get weekly updates, consider subscribing—it’s completely free!